We put the Vivo X90 Professional by our rigorous DXOMARK Digicam take a look at suite to measure its efficiency in picture, video, and zoom high quality from an end-user perspective. This text breaks down how the system fared in a wide range of checks and a number of other widespread use circumstances and is meant to spotlight crucial outcomes of our testing with an extract of the captured knowledge.
Overview
Key digicam specs:
- Main: 50.3MP 1/00″ sensor, 1.6 μm pixels, f/1.8 aperture lens,Twin Pixel PDAF, OIS
- Extremely-wide: 12 MP, f/2.0 aperture lens, 108Ëš subject of view, AF
- Tele: 50 MP 1/2.4″ sensor, 0.7µm pixels, f/1.6 aperture lens, OIS
- Video: 8K, 4K at 60/30fps, 1080p at 60/30fps
Scoring
Sub-scores and attributes included within the calculations of the worldwide rating.
Use circumstances & Situations
Use case scores point out the product efficiency in particular conditions. They aren’t included within the total rating calculations.
Out of doors
Images & movies shot in vivid mild circumstances (≥1000 lux)
Indoor
Images & movies shot in good lighting circumstances (≥100lux)
Lowlight
Images & movies shot in low lighting circumstances (<100 lux)
Buddies & Household
Portrait and group picture & movies
14th
4. Apple iPhone 14 Professional Max
146
7. Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max
141
13. Vivo X80 Professional (Snapdragon)
137
16. Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Snapdragon)
135
16. Vivo X80 Professional (MediaTek)
135
23. Apple iPhone 12 Professional Max
131
23. Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Exynos)
131
31. Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders
127
33. Vivo X70 Professional (MediaTek)
126
37. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
125
41. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
124
43. Apple iPhone 11 Professional Max
122
47. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
120
47. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
120
50. Samsung Galaxy S21 Extremely 5G (Snapdragon)
117
50. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
117
50. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
117
55. Vivo X60 Professional 5G (Snapdragon)
116
58. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Snapdragon)
115
58. Samsung Galaxy S21 Extremely 5G (Exynos)
115
67. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
112
69. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
111
69. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Exynos)
111
69. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
111
74. Vivo X60 Professional 5G (Exynos)
108
81. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
100
90. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
88
90. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
88
92. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
85
95. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
79
96. Xiaomi Redmi Observe 11 Professional 5G
78
98. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
70
100. Motorola Moto G62 5G
66
101. Xiaomi Redmi Observe 11S 5G
65
104. Honor Magic4 Lite 5G
61
106. Xiaomi Redmi Observe 11
60
109. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022
51
111. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
48
13th
4. Apple iPhone 14 Professional Max
146
7. Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max
141
12. Vivo X80 Professional (Snapdragon)
137
15. Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Snapdragon)
135
15. Vivo X80 Professional (MediaTek)
135
21. Apple iPhone 12 Professional Max
131
21. Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Exynos)
131
28. Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders
127
32. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
125
34. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
124
36. Apple iPhone 11 Professional Max
122
39. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
120
41. Samsung Galaxy S21 Extremely 5G (Snapdragon)
117
42. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Snapdragon)
115
42. Samsung Galaxy S21 Extremely 5G (Exynos)
115
46. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
112
47. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
111
47. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Exynos)
111
Execs
- Excessive-quality photos throughout the complete zoom vary
- Good publicity and large dynamic vary in picture and video
- Good element in outside portraits
- Effectively-controlled noise in movies
- Efficient video stabilization
Cons
- Autofocus failures
- Low distinction on faces in backlit scenes
- Wonderful luminance noise in backlit scenes
- Unnatural texture rendering and artifacts, similar to, quantization and ghosting, in night time mode
- Extra restricted dynamic vary in preview than in seize
- Often unstable and jerky autofocus in video
The Vivo X90 Professional takes good benefit of its 1-inch fundamental digicam sensor in terms of picture efficiency. The digicam confirmed good ends in the feel/noise tradeoff in picture, with stage of particulars in addition to low noise stage even all the way down to low mild. However when taking pictures backlit scenes, our checks confirmed that denoising may not at all times be environment friendly.
The Vivo X90 Professional’s different energy was its publicity efficiency, the place it managed to get well particulars in each shadows and highlights because of its large dynamic vary. However the digicam struggled with backlit scenes right here too, with native tone mapping points that led to low distinction on the face.
One fundamental downside to the photo-taking expertise was not solely the time it will take for the primary digicam to autofocus, Â but additionally the occasional failure to focus.
The digicam supplied a wealthy expertise when taking movies, with good stabilization in addition to typically correct publicity. However focus instabilities and slight publicity adaptation points had been generally noticeable.
In lots of areas, the Vivo X90 Professional’s digicam efficiency got here near the extra highly effective Vivo X90 Professional+ model. However there have been some noticeable variations that could possibly be partly attributed to the totally different chipsets within the fashions. (The X90 Professional is provided with a MediaTek processor, whereas the X90 Professional+ accommodates Qualcomm’s Snapdragon processor).
For instance, though the Vivo X90 Professional saved picture noise ranges nicely beneath management, they had been nonetheless greater than on the X90 Professional+, and some undesirable picture artifacts had been generally noticeable. Nonetheless, the X90 Professional’s picture outcomes had been particularly spectacular in night time cityscape photos.
When it comes to zoom efficiency, the X90 Professional’s mixture of a main digicam with ultra-wide and devoted tele modules resulted in good picture high quality from ultra-wide to medium vary tele settings. Nonetheless, when it got here to the lengthy vary, the extent of element was reasonably low.
When taking movies, the X90 Professional’s digicam produced secure publicity and coloration, whereas maintaining video noise at very low ranges and rendering good textures. This made the X90 Professional’s movies look extra pure movies than the X90 Professional+’s movies.
Check abstract
About DXOMARK Digicam checks: DXOMARK’s Digicam evaluations happen in laboratories and in real-world conditions utilizing all kinds of topics. The scores depend on goal checks for which the outcomes are calculated immediately by measurement software program on our laboratory setups, and on perceptual checks wherein a complicated set of metrics permit a panel of picture consultants to match points of picture high quality that require human judgment. Testing a smartphone entails a crew of engineers and technicians for a couple of week. Photograph, Zoom, and Video high quality are scored individually after which mixed into an General rating for comparability among the many cameras in numerous units. For extra details about the DXOMARK Digicam protocol, click on right here. Extra particulars on smartphone digicam scores can be found right here. The next part gathers key parts of DXOMARK’s exhaustive checks and analyses. Full efficiency evaluations can be found upon request. Please contact us on the right way to obtain a full report.
Vivo X90 Professional Digicam Scores vs Extremely-Premium
This graph compares DXOMARK picture, zoom and video scores between the examined system and references. Common and most scores of the worth section are additionally indicated. Common and most scores for every value section are computed primarily based on the DXOMARK database of units examined.
Photograph
133
Huawei Mate 50 Professional
Huawei Mate 50 Professional
About DXOMARK Digicam Photograph checks
For scoring and evaluation, DXOMARK engineers seize and consider greater than 2,600 take a look at photos each in managed lab environments and in outside, indoor and low-light pure scenes, utilizing the digicam’s default settings. The picture protocol is designed to take into consideration the primary use circumstances and relies on typical taking pictures situations, similar to portraits, household, and panorama images. The analysis is carried out by visually inspecting photos towards a reference of pure scenes, and by working goal measurements on photos of charts captured within the lab beneath totally different lighting circumstances from 1 to 1,000+ lux and coloration temperatures from 2,300K to six,500K.
The Vivo X90 Professional carried out very nicely in our Photograph checks. Pictures had been nicely uncovered, even in low mild. A large dynamic vary ensured good spotlight and shadow element and colours had been good, with a reasonably impartial white stability. Out of doors portrait pictures confirmed excessive ranges of element, and pictures had been nicely beneath management in low mild. The autofocus carried out swiftly however in some conditions, it lacked accuracy. Our testers additionally noticed some undesirable picture artifacts, together with ghosting and unnatural rendering of textures in night time portraits.
Vivo X90 Professional Photograph scores vs Extremely-Premium
The picture checks analyze picture high quality attributes similar to publicity, coloration, texture, and noise in varied mild circumstances. Autofocus performances and the presence of artifacts on all photos captured in managed lab circumstances and in real-life photos are additionally evaluated. All these attributes have a big influence on the ultimate high quality of the pictures captured with the examined system and may help to know the digicam’s fundamental strengths and weaknesses.
Publicity
111
Huawei Mate 50 Professional
Huawei Mate 50 Professional
Publicity and coloration are the important thing attributes for technically good photos. For publicity, the primary attribute evaluated is the brightness of the primary topic by varied use circumstances similar to panorama, portrait, or nonetheless life. Different elements evaluated are the distinction and the dynamic vary, eg. the power to render seen particulars in each vivid and darkish areas of the picture. Repeatability can be necessary as a result of it demonstrates the digicam’s means to offer the identical rendering when taking pictures a number of photos of the identical scene.
For coloration, the picture high quality attributes analyzed are skin-tone rendering, white stability, coloration shading, and repeatability. For coloration and pores and skin tone rendering, we penalize unnatural colours however we respect a producer’s alternative of coloration signature.
The Vivo X90 Professional’s publicity was correct in most circumstances and outperformed each the Vivo X80 Professional and the Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely, particularly in low mild.
Vivo X90 Professional – correct publicity, large dynamic vary
Vivo X80 Professional – correct publicity, large dynamic vary
Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely – slight underexposure, barely restricted dynamic vary
Colour
110
Google Pixel 7 Professional
Google Pixel 7 Professional
Colours had been correct in most circumstances, and white stability was good, regardless of some noticeable coloration casts, like within the pattern under. Tone compression was noticeable on each the X90 Professional and the X90 Professional+, leading to pores and skin tones that had been extra unnatural than on the Huawei Mate 50 Professional. Unnatural pores and skin tone rendering was usually noticeable in backlit scenes. Underneath these sorts of circumstances, the digicam had hassle rendering the tones of the scene in a pure approach.
Vivo X90 Professional – slight yellow forged, tone compression on face
Vivo X90 Professional+ – yellow forged, tone compression on face
Huawei Mate 50 Professional – impartial white stability and nice pores and skin tones
Autofocus
74
Huawei Mate 50 Professional
Huawei Mate 50 Professional
Autofocus checks focus on focus accuracy, focus repeatability, taking pictures time delay, and depth of subject. Taking pictures delay is the distinction between the time the person presses the seize button and the time the picture is definitely taken. It consists of focusing velocity and the aptitude of the system to seize photos on the proper time, what is named ‘zero shutter lag’ functionality. Even when a shallow depth of subject could be nice for a single-subject portrait or close-up shot, it can be an issue in some particular circumstances similar to group portraits; Each conditions are examined. Focus accuracy can be evaluated in all of the real-life photos taken, from infinity to close-up objects and in low mild to outside circumstances.
The autofocus on the X90 Professional is a serious space that wants enchancment. Our testers in contrast the Vivo towards the Google Pixel 7 Professional in a pure take a look at scene, the place the photographer first targeted on some extent within the distance after which rapidly moved the digicam in an effort to seize a mannequin at a better distance. Within the video, we will see seize time after triggering the shutter button was fairly quick for each units, however on the Vivo, the autofocus failed.
Vivo X90 Professional and Google Pixel 7 Professional – autofocus comparability
The identical conduct was additionally seen in our lab measurements the place we steadily encountered out-of-focus pictures. In contrast with the Vivo X90 Professional+, it seems that the X90 Professional makes use of a special autofocus technique. The X90 Professional tries to seize the topic as rapidly as doable, even when the main focus has not but been locked fully. The X90 Professional+, then again, takes longer to seize, ready till full focus has been virtually achieved. As could be seen within the video above, the Pixel 7 Professional, delivered wonderful outcomes with each a quick and correct autofocus.
Autofocus irregularity and velocity: 1000Lux Δ4EV Daylight Handheld
This graph illustrates focus accuracy and velocity and in addition zero shutter lag functionality by exhibiting the sting acutance versus the taking pictures time measured on the AFHDR setup on a sequence of images. All photos had been taken at 1000Lux with Daylight illuminant, 500ms after the defocus. On this state of affairs, the backlit panels within the scene are set as much as simulate a reasonably excessive dynamic vary: the luminance ratio between the brightest level and a 18% reflective grey patch is 4, which we denote by a Publicity Worth distinction of 4. The sting acutance is measured on the 4 edges of the Useless Leaves chart, and the taking pictures time is measured on the LED Common Timer.
Texture
97
Oppo Discover X5
Oppo Discover X5
Texture checks analyze the extent of particulars and the feel of topics within the photos taken within the lab in addition to in real-life situations. For pure pictures, explicit consideration is paid to the extent of particulars within the vivid and darkish areas of the picture. Goal measurements are carried out on chart photos taken in varied lighting circumstances from 1 to 1000 lux and totally different sorts of dynamic vary circumstances. The charts used are the proprietary DXOMARK chart (DMC) and the Useless Leaves chart.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) element preservation rating vs lux ranges for tripod and handheld circumstances
This graph reveals the evolution of the DMC element preservation rating with the extent of lux, for 2 holding circumstances. DMC element preservation rating is derived from an AI-based metric skilled to guage texture and particulars rendering on a choice of crops of our DXOMARK chart.
Noise
104
Honor Magic4 Final
Honor Magic4 Final
Noise checks analyze varied attributes of noise similar to depth, chromaticity, grain, construction on real-life photos in addition to photos of charts taken within the lab. For pure photos, explicit consideration is paid to the noise on faces, landscapes, but additionally on darkish areas and excessive dynamic vary circumstances. Noise on transferring objects can be evaluated on pure photos. Goal measurements are carried out on photos of charts taken in varied circumstances from 1 to 1000 lux and totally different sorts of dynamic vary circumstances. The chart used is the Useless Leaves chart and the standardized measurement similar to Visible Noise derived from ISO 15739.
The X90 Professional delivered photos with pretty low noise ranges. Nonetheless, in contrast with the X90 Professional+, extra noise was seen in backlit scenes, leading to a decrease noise rating.
Vivo X90 Professional+ – slight noise
Â
Vivo X90 Professional – shadow noise
Vivo X90 Professional+ – shadow noise nicely beneath management
Artifacts
78
Google Pixel 6
Google Pixel 6
The artifacts analysis seems to be at lens shading, chromatic aberrations, geometrical distortion, edges ringing, halos, ghosting, quantization, sudden coloration hue shifts, amongst others kind of doable unnatural results on images. The extra extreme and the extra frequent the artifact, the upper the purpose deduction on the rating. The primary artifacts noticed and corresponding level loss are listed under.
Foremost picture artifacts penalties
Bokeh
70
Huawei Mate 50 Professional
Huawei Mate 50 Professional
Bokeh is examined in a single devoted mode, normally portrait or aperture mode, and analyzed by visually inspecting all the pictures captured within the lab and in pure circumstances. The purpose is to breed portrait images comparable to 1 taken with a DLSR and a large aperture. The primary picture high quality attributes paid consideration to are depth estimation, artifacts, blur gradient, and the form of the bokeh blur spotlights. Portrait picture high quality attributes (publicity, coloration, texture) are additionally taken under consideration.
The X90 Professional’s portrait mode carried out nicely in our checks. attaining the identical rating because the X90 Professional+. Nonetheless, bokeh scenes had been rendered in a different way on the 2 units. On this instance, no highlight enhancement was seen on the X90 Professional, whereas the X90 Professional+ captured much less element on the face. Depth artifacts had been generally seen.
Vivo X90 Professional – bokeh mode
Vivo X90 Professional – good element, correct depth estimation
Vivo X90 Professional+ – bokeh mode
Vivo X90 Professional+ – barely much less element, correct depth estimation
Vivo X90 Professional – virtually all objects within the focus airplane are sharp, however some failures are seen on the correct aspect of the picture
Preview
71
Apple iPhone 14 Professional Max
Apple iPhone 14 Professional Max
Preview checks analyze the picture high quality of the digicam app’s preview of the picture, with explicit consideration paid to the distinction between the seize and the preview, particularly concerning dynamic vary and the appliance of the bokeh impact. Additionally evaluated is the smoothness of the publicity, coloration and focus adaptation when zooming from the minimal to the maximal zoom issue out there. The preview body charge is measured utilizing the LED Common Timer.
Vivo X90 Professional – preview – spotlight clipping (100 lux TL84 EV7)
Vivo X90 Professional – seize – higher dynamic vary (100 lux TL84 EV7)
Zoom
141
Honor Magic4 Final
Honor Magic4 Final
About DXOMARK Digicam Zoom checks
DXOMARK engineers seize and consider over 400 take a look at photos in managed lab environments and in outside, indoor, and low-light pure scenes, utilizing the digicam’s default settings and pinch zoom at varied zoom elements from extremely large to very long-range zoom. The analysis is carried out by visually inspecting the pictures towards a reference of pure scenes, and by working goal measurements of chart mages captured within the lab beneath totally different circumstances from 20 to 1000 lux and coloration temperatures from 2300K to 6500K.
The Vivo X90 Professional captured good picture high quality throughout the complete zoom vary, from ultra-wide to lengthy tele. Whereas the top-of-the-line X90 Professional+ makes use of two tele modules, the Vivo X90 Professional has to make do with only one. In our checks, this resulted in barely greater noise ranges and fewer high-quality element. On the ultra-wide finish of the zoom, with a 16mm measured focal size, the Vivo X90 Professional shouldn’t be fairly as large because the flagship mannequin at 14.5mm. Nonetheless, normally, picture high quality was very comparable between the 2 fashions, besides at lengthy vary tele settings.
Vivo X90 Professional Zoom Scores vs Extremely-Premium
This graph illustrates the relative scores for the totally different zoom ranges evaluated. The abscissa is expressed in 35mm equal focal size. Zooming-in scores are displayed on the correct and Zooming-out scores on the left.
Large
90
Huawei Mate 50 Professional
Huawei Mate 50 Professional
These checks analyze the efficiency of the ultra-wide digicam at a number of focal lengths from 12 mm to twenty mm. All picture high quality attributes are evaluated, with explicit consideration paid to such artifacts as chromatic aberrations, lens softness, and distortion. Footage under are an extract of examined scenes.
The X90 Professional’s ultra-wide module gave an analogous consequence because the X90 Professional+. The one distinction was within the narrower subject of view on the X90 Professional, as proven within the instance under.
Vivo X90 Professional – ultra-wide – good coloration rendering, low noise
Vivo X90 Professional+ – ultra-wide – good coloration rendering, low noise
Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely – ultra-wide – good coloration rendering, noise
Tele
107
Honor Magic4 Final
Honor Magic4 Final
All picture high quality attributes are evaluated at focal lengths from roughly 40 mm to 300 mm, with explicit consideration paid to texture and element. The rating is derived from various goal measurements within the lab and perceptual evaluation of real-life photos.
Texture rendering was related between the Vivo X90 Professional and X90 Professional+ at shut and medium vary tele settings. For the X90 Professional, the element preservation rating elevated at 96mm in mild circumstances of 100 lux and 1000 lux, which could be defined by the feel/noise trade-off that didn’t differ at this focal size. Thus, because the noise stage rose, so did the extent of element.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) element preservation rating per focal size
This graph reveals the evolution of the DMC element preservation rating with respect to the full-frame equal focal size for various mild circumstances. The x-axis represents the equal focal size measured for every corresponding taking pictures distance and the y-axis represents the utmost particulars preservation metric rating: greater worth means higher high quality. Giant dots correspond to zoom ratio out there within the person interface of the digicam utility.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) element preservation rating per focal size
This graph reveals the evolution of the DMC element preservation rating with respect to the full-frame equal focal size for various mild circumstances. The x-axis represents the equal focal size measured for every corresponding taking pictures distance and the y-axis represents the utmost particulars preservation metric rating: greater worth means higher high quality. Giant dots correspond to zoom ratio out there within the person interface of the digicam utility.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) element preservation rating per focal size
This graph reveals the evolution of the DMC element preservation rating with respect to the full-frame equal focal size for various mild circumstances. The x-axis represents the equal focal size measured for every corresponding taking pictures distance and the y-axis represents the utmost particulars preservation metric rating: greater worth means higher high quality. Giant dots correspond to zoom ratio out there within the person interface of the digicam utility.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) element preservation rating per focal size
This graph reveals the evolution of the DMC element preservation rating with respect to the full-frame equal focal size for various mild circumstances. The x-axis represents the equal focal size measured for every corresponding taking pictures distance and the y-axis represents the utmost particulars preservation metric rating: greater worth means higher high quality. Giant dots correspond to zoom ratio out there within the person interface of the digicam utility.
Nonetheless, at longer tele settings, the variations between the 2 cameras turned fairly apparent.
Vivo X90 Professional – additional lengthy tele (round 750mm)
Vivo X90 Professional – full lack of element
Vivo X90 Professional+ – additional lengthy tele (round 750mm)
Vivo X90 Professional+ – lack of element
Video
133
Apple iPhone 14 Professional Max
Apple iPhone 14 Professional Max
About DXOMARK Digicam Video checks
DXOMARK engineers seize and consider greater than 2.5 hours of video in managed lab environments and in pure low-light, indoor and outside scenes, utilizing the digicam’s default settings. The analysis consists of visually inspecting pure movies taken in varied circumstances and working goal measurements on movies of charts recorded within the lab beneath totally different circumstances from 1 to 1000+ lux and coloration temperatures from 2,300K to six,500K.
Video clips captured with the Vivo X90 Professional provided secure publicity and coloration in all circumstances. As well as, video noise was nicely beneath management, and the digicam managed to realize good publicity, even in low mild. On the draw back, our testers observed some slight focus instabilities and inaccuracies.
Vivo X90 Professional Video scores vs Extremely-Premium
Video checks analyze the identical picture high quality attributes as for nonetheless photos, similar to publicity, coloration, texture, or noise, along with temporal points similar to velocity, and smoothness and stability of publicity, white stability, and autofocus transitions.
Publicity
105
Apple iPhone 14 Professional Max
Apple iPhone 14 Professional Max
Colour
105
Apple iPhone 14 Professional Max
Apple iPhone 14 Professional Max
Publicity checks consider the brightness of the primary topic and the dynamic vary, eg. the power to render seen particulars in each vivid and darkish areas of the picture. Stability and temporal adaption of the publicity are additionally analyzed.
Picture-quality coloration evaluation seems to be at coloration rendering, skin-tone rendering, white stability, coloration shading, stability of the white stability and its adaption when mild is altering.
Vivo X90 Professional – pure coloration however slight inexperienced/yellow forged
Vivo X90 Professional+ – good coloration rendering
Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely – good coloration rendering
Texture
106
Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely
Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely
Texture checks analyze the extent of particulars and texture of the real-life movies in addition to the movies of charts recorded within the lab. Pure movies recordings are visually evaluated, with explicit consideration paid to the extent of particulars within the vivid and areas in addition to at the hours of darkness. Goal measurements are carried out of photos of charts taken in varied circumstances from 1 to 1000 lux. The charts used are the DXOMARK chart (DMC) and Useless Leaves chart.
Video clips captured with the Vivo X90 Professional contained higher element than these recorded with the X90 Professional+. Texture rendering was additionally much less pure on the X90 Professional+, particularly in low mild.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) element preservation video rating vs lux ranges
This graph reveals the evolution of the DMC element preservation video rating with the extent of lux in video. DMC element preservation rating is derived from an AI-based metric skilled to guage texture and particulars rendering on a choice of crops of our DXOMARK chart.
Noise
113
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Noise checks analyze varied attributes of noise similar to depth, chromaticity, grain, construction, temporal points on real-life video recording in addition to movies of charts taken within the lab. Pure movies are visually evaluated, with explicit consideration paid to the noise at the hours of darkness areas and excessive dynamic vary circumstances. Goal measurements are carried out on the movies of charts recorded in varied circumstances from 1 to 1000 lux. The chart used is the DXOMARK visible noise chart.
The Vivo X90 Professional additionally managed noise higher than the X90 Professional+, particularly in low mild. General, the X90 Professional delivered a greater texture/noise ratio.
Vivo X90 Professional – slight noise, slight lack of element
Vivo X90 Professional+ – noise, unnatural texture on faces
Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Snapdragon) – noise, unnatural textures on faces
Spatial visible noise evolution with the illuminance stage
This graph reveals the evolution of spatial visible noise with the extent of lux. Spatial visible noise is measured on the visible noise chart within the video noise setup. DXOMARK visible noise measurement is derived from ISO15739 normal.
Temporal visible noise evolution with the illuminance stage
This graph reveals the evolution of temporal visible noise with the extent of lux. Temporal visible noise is measured on the visible noise chart within the video noise setup.
Stabilization
110
Apple iPhone 14 Professional Max
Apple iPhone 14 Professional Max
Stabilization analysis checks the power of the system to stabilize footage because of software program or {hardware} applied sciences similar to OIS, EIS, or any others means. The analysis seems to be at residual movement, smoothness, jellow artifacts and residual movement blur on stroll and run use circumstances in varied lighting circumstances. The video under is an extract from one of many examined scenes.
Vivo X90 Professional – fairly efficient stabilization
Vivo X90 Professional+ – efficient stabilization
Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely – fairly efficient stabilization
Artifacts
78
Xiaomi 12S Extremely
Xiaomi 12S Extremely
Artifacts are evaluated with MTF and ringing measurements on the SFR chart within the lab in addition to frame-rate measurements utilizing the LED Common Timer. Pure movies are visually evaluated by paying explicit consideration to artifacts similar to aliasing, quantization, blocking, and hue shift, amongst others. The extra extreme and the extra frequent the artifact, the upper the purpose deduction from the rating. The primary artifacts and corresponding level loss are listed under.
Foremost video artifacts penalties
Â
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24547615/236586_Asus_ROG_Flow_Z13_Acronym_AKrales_0158.jpg)
