We put the Vivo X90 Professional+ by way of our rigorous DXOMARK Digital camera take a look at suite to measure its efficiency in photograph, video, and zoom high quality from an end-user perspective. This text breaks down how the machine fared in quite a lot of checks and a number of other frequent use circumstances and is meant to spotlight crucial outcomes of our testing with an extract of the captured information.
Overview
Key digital camera specs:
- Main: 50MP 1-inch sort sensor, f/1.75 aperture lens, AF, OIS
- Extremely-wide: 48MP sensor, f/2.2 aperture lens, AF
- Tele: 50MP sensor, f/1.6 aperture lens, OIS
- Tele: 64MP sensor, f/3.5 aperture periscope lens, AF, OIS
Scoring
Sub-scores and attributes included within the calculations of the worldwide rating.
Use circumstances & Circumstances
Use case scores point out the product efficiency in particular conditions. They don’t seem to be included within the general rating calculations.
Out of doors
Images & movies shot in shiny gentle circumstances (≥1000 lux)
Indoor
Images & movies shot in good lighting circumstances (≥100lux)
Lowlight
Images & movies shot in low lighting circumstances (<100 lux)
Pals & Household
Portrait and group photograph & movies
10th
4. Apple iPhone 14 Professional Max
146
7. Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max
141
13. Vivo X80 Professional (Snapdragon)
137
15. Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Snapdragon)
135
15. Vivo X80 Professional (MediaTek)
135
22. Apple iPhone 12 Professional Max
131
22. Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Exynos)
131
30. Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders
127
32. Vivo X70 Professional (MediaTek)
126
36. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
125
40. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
124
42. Apple iPhone 11 Professional Max
122
46. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
120
46. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
120
49. Samsung Galaxy S21 Extremely 5G (Snapdragon)
117
49. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
117
49. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
117
54. Vivo X60 Professional 5G (Snapdragon)
116
57. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Snapdragon)
115
57. Samsung Galaxy S21 Extremely 5G (Exynos)
115
66. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
112
68. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
111
68. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Exynos)
111
68. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
111
73. Vivo X60 Professional 5G (Exynos)
108
80. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
100
89. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
88
89. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
88
91. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
85
94. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
79
95. Xiaomi Redmi Word 11 Professional 5G
78
97. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
70
100. Xiaomi Redmi Word 11S 5G
65
103. Honor Magic4 Lite 5G
61
105. Xiaomi Redmi Word 11
60
108. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022
51
110. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
48
10th
4. Apple iPhone 14 Professional Max
146
7. Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max
141
12. Vivo X80 Professional (Snapdragon)
137
14. Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Snapdragon)
135
14. Vivo X80 Professional (MediaTek)
135
20. Apple iPhone 12 Professional Max
131
20. Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Exynos)
131
27. Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders
127
31. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
125
33. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
124
35. Apple iPhone 11 Professional Max
122
38. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
120
40. Samsung Galaxy S21 Extremely 5G (Snapdragon)
117
41. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Snapdragon)
115
41. Samsung Galaxy S21 Extremely 5G (Exynos)
115
45. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
112
46. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
111
46. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Exynos)
111
Professionals
-
Pretty good element in pictures
-
Good publicity in most examined circumstances for each photograph and video
-
Pretty low noise in shiny gentle and indoors for each photograph and video
-
Good element in any respect zoom settings
Cons
-
Autofocus gradual to react in photograph and video mode, some failures in video
-
Sometimes inaccurate coloration rendering on darkish pores and skin tones in backlit scenes
-
Fusion artifacts in high-contrast scenes
The Vivo X90 Professional+ represents a big evolution over final 12 months’s Vivo X80 Professional as it’s each the primary smartphone we examined to come back with Qualcomm’s new Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset, and the primary Vivo to make use of a 1-inch sensor in the principle digital camera module. Like earlier Vivo flagships, it additionally options Zeiss T* optical coating on the lenses.
With such spectacular digital camera {hardware}, it’s no shock the Vivo X90 Professional+ supplied fairly detailed nonetheless photos in our testing throughout all gentle circumstances. The big 1-inch sensor’s potential to gather gentle was additionally noticeable by way of picture noise, which was nicely underneath management, particularly in shiny gentle and indoors. The X90 Professional+ pictures additionally confirmed good publicity administration in addition to a reasonably correct white stability in most conditions. We seen some drawbacks when it got here to paint, although, with inaccurate rendering of darkish pores and skin tones in backlit scenes, in addition to some coloration quantization underneath indoor lighting and decrease illumination ranges.
Along with the first digital camera, the Vivo X90 Professional+ options an ultra-wide-angle module with a 14mm equal focal size, in addition to two telephoto lenses equal to 50mm and 90mm. General, the digital camera setup affords a x100 zoom issue (together with digital zoom). Because of the mix of those a number of modules, zoom high quality was one of many Vivo’s sturdy factors in our testing. Element was good from ultra-wide to long-range tele and general the X90 Professional+ achieved the second highest rating for zoom thus far, simply behind the Honor Magic4 Final, which affords barely higher element at long-range tele.
In video mode, the Vivo X90 Professional+ carried out nicely general, primarily due to well-exposed video clips with a reasonably large dynamic vary. Nevertheless, the Vivo lagged behind some gadgets in its class by way of element preservation. The digital camera’s texture/noise compromise in video resulted in softened particulars, particularly underneath indoor lighting and in low gentle.
Pals & Household
The Vivo X90 Professional+’s major digital camera module makes use of a big 1-inch sensor together with a reasonably quick f/1.8 aperture lens, which, for a smartphone, leads to a slender depth of discipline and a pure bokeh impact which will have some enchantment for particular person portrait scenes. Nevertheless, it turns into a drawback in a few of our Pals & Household use circumstances, which function a number of topics on completely different planes inside the scene. In this type of taking pictures state of affairs, the Vivo X90 Professional+ was not in a position to keep a adequate degree of sharpness on all faces.
As well as, the Vivo X90 Professional+’s shutter lag was fairly lengthy when in comparison with its rivals within the Extremely-Premium section. Which means that the shot is captured a fraction of a second after the shutter is pressed, not precisely on the similar time. This isn’t a problem for panorama pictures, however it will possibly turn out to be a problem when attempting to seize the decisive second at a household occasion.
Vivo X90 Professional+ – Good publicity and coloration, blurry background topic
Lowlight
Within the low-light use case, the Vivo’s giant sensor is an actual benefit when capturing nonetheless photos. In contrast with smaller sensors of the identical decision, the 1-inch 50MP variant has bigger photosites with a higher gentle assortment capability. In our testing, this translated into well-exposed photos, even in probably the most difficult low-light circumstances, reminiscent of night time pictures. In these conditions, the Vivo X90 Professional+ supplied a reasonably large dynamic vary and a excessive degree of element, whereas holding picture noise nicely underneath management.
Vivo X90 Professional+ – Pretty large dynamic vary even all the way down to low-light circumstances
Take a look at abstract
About DXOMARK Digital camera checks: DXOMARK’s Digital camera evaluations happen in laboratories and in real-world conditions utilizing all kinds of topics. The scores depend on goal checks for which the outcomes are calculated instantly by measurement software program on our laboratory setups, and on perceptual checks through which a complicated set of metrics permit a panel of picture consultants to check features of picture high quality that require human judgment. Testing a smartphone entails a group of engineers and technicians for a few week. Photograph, Zoom, and Video high quality are scored individually after which mixed into an General rating for comparability among the many cameras in several gadgets. For extra details about the DXOMARK Digital camera protocol, click on right here. Extra particulars on smartphone digital camera scores can be found right here. The next part gathers key parts of DXOMARK’s exhaustive checks and analyses. Full efficiency evaluations can be found upon request. Please contact us on tips on how to obtain a full report.
Vivo X90 Professional Plus Digital camera Scores vs Extremely-Premium
This graph compares DXOMARK photograph, zoom and video scores between the examined machine and references. Common and most scores of the worth section are additionally indicated. Common and most scores for every value section are computed based mostly on the DXOMARK database of gadgets examined.
Photograph
142
Huawei Mate 50 Professional
Huawei Mate 50 Professional
About DXOMARK Digital camera Photograph checks
For scoring and evaluation, DXOMARK engineers seize and consider greater than 2,600 take a look at photos each in managed lab environments and in out of doors, indoor and low-light pure scenes, utilizing the digital camera’s default settings. The photograph protocol is designed to take into consideration the principle use circumstances and is predicated on typical taking pictures situations, reminiscent of portraits, household, and panorama pictures. The analysis is carried out by visually inspecting photos towards a reference of pure scenes, and by operating goal measurements on photos of charts captured within the lab underneath completely different lighting circumstances from 1 to 1,000+ lux and coloration temperatures from 2,300K to six,500K.
In photograph mode, the Vivo X90 Professional+ supplied good picture high quality and efficiency general. Each panorama and portrait pictures have been usually uncovered nicely and the digital camera captured fairly excessive ranges of element, even in low-light circumstances. As well as, picture noise was pretty nicely underneath management. Nevertheless, our testers additionally noticed some shortcomings, together with an autofocus that was gradual to react, inaccurate darkish pores and skin tones, and fusion artifacts, which prevented the Vivo from climbing larger up the rankings for Extremely-Premium telephones. Nonetheless, it’s a very good choice for nonetheless picture shooters.
Vivo X90 Professional Plus Photograph scores vs Extremely-Premium
The photograph checks analyze picture high quality attributes reminiscent of publicity, coloration, texture, and noise in varied gentle circumstances. Autofocus performances and the presence of artifacts on all photos captured in managed lab circumstances and in real-life photos are additionally evaluated. All these attributes have a big influence on the ultimate high quality of the photographs captured with the examined machine and may also help to grasp the digital camera’s fundamental strengths and weaknesses.
Shut-Up
Our close-up take a look at evaluates the digital camera’s potential to seize element at topic distances beneath 10cm and magnifications as shut as doable to 1:1. The Vivo X90 Professional+ adopted the habits of most up-to-date smartphones and mechanically switched to macro mode when the digital camera obtained very near a topic. In our testing, the Vivo didn’t permit for a similar excessive magnification ratios as one of the best in school, such because the Apple iPhone 14 Professional or Huawei Mate 50 Professional, however the function however affords new inventive alternatives to the consumer.
Vivo X90 Professional+ – Restricted magnification ratio
Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Snapdragon) – Greater magnification ratio
Publicity
110
Huawei Mate 50 Professional
Huawei Mate 50 Professional
Publicity is likely one of the key attributes for technically good photos. The principle attribute evaluated is the brightness of the principle topic by way of varied use circumstances reminiscent of panorama, portrait, or nonetheless life. Different components evaluated are the distinction and the dynamic vary, eg. the power to render seen particulars in each shiny and darkish areas of the picture. Repeatability can also be necessary as a result of it demonstrates the digital camera’s potential to offer the identical rendering when taking pictures a number of photos of the identical scene.
Publicity was correct in most gentle conditions, with a large dynamic vary, for portrait and panorama pictures alike. The one draw back was an occasional lack of distinction in portrait scenes with sturdy backlighting.
Vivo X90 Professional+ – Extensive dynamic vary
Vivo X80 Professional – Restricted dynamic vary
Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Snapdragon) – Restricted dynamic vary
Vivo X90 Professional+ – Extensive dynamic vary, low distinction on topics
Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Snapdragon) – Restricted dynamic vary, higher distinction on topics
Colour
108
Google Pixel 7 Professional
Google Pixel 7 Professional
Colour is likely one of the key attributes for technically good photos. The picture high quality attributes analyzed are skin-tone rendering, white stability, coloration shading, and repeatability. For coloration and pores and skin tone rendering, we penalize unnatural colours however we respect a producer’s alternative of coloration signature.
General, the Vivo X90 Professional+ produced photos with pleasing colours. White stability was principally acceptable, if a bit chilly, and saturation was nicely managed. Our testers, nevertheless, seen some obvious failures by way of coloration rendering on darkish pores and skin tones underneath sturdy backlighting.
Vivo X90 Professional+ – Acceptable white stability
Vivo X80 Professional – Acceptable white stability
Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Snapdragon) – Acceptable white stability
Vivo X90 Professional+ – Unacceptable coloration rendering of darkish pores and skin tones
Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Snapdragon) – Acceptable coloration rendering
Autofocus
85
Huawei Mate 50 Professional
Huawei Mate 50 Professional
Autofocus checks consider focus accuracy, focus repeatability, taking pictures time delay, and depth of discipline. Taking pictures delay is the distinction between the time the consumer presses the seize button and the time the picture is definitely taken. It contains focusing pace and the potential of the machine to seize photos on the proper time, what is named ‘zero shutter lag’ functionality. Even when a shallow depth of discipline may be nice for a single topic portrait or close-up shot, it can be an issue in some particular circumstances reminiscent of group portraits; Each conditions are examined. Focus accuracy can also be evaluated in all of the real-life photos taken, from infinity to close-up objects and in low gentle to out of doors circumstances.
Not like lots of its Extremely-Premium rivals, the X90 Professional+ doesn’t supply zero-shutter lag (seize at precisely the identical time because the shutter is pressed), which meant that taking pictures shifting topics was troublesome.
Autofocus irregularity and pace: 20Lux Δ7EV Tungsten Handheld
This graph illustrates focus accuracy and pace and in addition zero shutter lag functionality by exhibiting the sting acutance versus the taking pictures time measured on the AFHDR setup on a collection of images. All photos have been taken at 20Lux with Tungsten illuminant, 500ms after the defocus. On this state of affairs, the backlit panels within the scene are set as much as simulate a reasonably excessive dynamic vary: the luminance ratio between the brightest level and a 18% reflective grey patch is 7, which we denote by a Publicity Worth distinction of seven. The sting acutance is measured on the 4 edges of the Lifeless Leaves chart, and the taking pictures time is measured on the LED Common Timer.
Â
Vivo X90 Professional+ – Seen shutter lag, the picture is captured a fraction of second after the shutter was pressed, lacking the important thing second.
Google Pixel 7 Professional – Zero shutter lag, picture captured for the time being when the photographer pressed the shutter.
As well as, the Vivo was penalized by its giant picture sensor, which produced photos with a slender depth of discipline. This resulted in group pictures through which topics towards the again have been out of focus. Different producers, reminiscent of Huawei, with the Mate 50 Professional, have began implementing options reminiscent of a variable aperture to make sure a adequate degree of sharpness on all faces in such scenes.
Texture
112
Oppo Discover X5
Oppo Discover X5
Texture checks analyze the extent of particulars and the feel of topics within the photos taken within the lab in addition to in real-life situations. For pure pictures, explicit consideration is paid to the extent of particulars within the shiny and darkish areas of the picture. Goal measurements are carried out on chart photos taken in varied lighting circumstances from 1 to 1000 lux and completely different sorts of dynamic vary circumstances. The charts used are the proprietary DXOMARK chart (DMC) and the Lifeless Leaves chart.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) element preservation rating vs lux ranges for tripod and handheld circumstances
This graph exhibits the evolution of the DMC element preservation rating with the extent of lux, for 2 holding circumstances. DMC element preservation rating is derived from an AI-based metric educated to guage texture and particulars rendering on a number of crops of our DXOMARK chart.
In our testing, the Vivo X90 Professional+ produced pretty excessive ranges of element, together with in night time scenes with very low luminosity.
Vivo X90 Professional+ – Element in night time scene
Vivo X90 Professional+ – Excessive degree of element
Vivo X80 Professional – Element in night time scene
Vivo X80 Professional – Decrease degree of element
Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely – Element in night time scene
Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely – Decrease degree of element
Noise
110
Honor Magic4 Final
Honor Magic4 Final
Noise checks analyze varied attributes of noise reminiscent of depth, chromaticity, grain, construction on real-life photos in addition to photos of charts taken within the lab. For pure photos, explicit consideration is paid to the noise on faces, landscapes, but in addition on darkish areas and excessive dynamic vary circumstances. Noise on shifting objects can also be evaluated on pure photos. Goal measurements are carried out on photos of charts taken in varied circumstances from 1 to 1000 lux and completely different sorts of dynamic vary circumstances. The chart used is the Lifeless Leaves chart and the standardized measurement reminiscent of Visible Noise derived from ISO 15739.
Visible noise evolution with illuminance ranges in handheld situation
This graph exhibits the evolution of visible noise metric with the extent of lux in handheld situation. The visible noise metric is the imply of visible noise measurement on all patches of the Lifeless Leaves chart within the AFHDR setup. DXOMARK visible noise measurement is derived from ISO15739 customary.
Whereas the noise ranges measured within the lab have been barely larger than on the Vivo X80 Professional and Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely, noise remained nicely managed in most circumstances. Noise was additionally finely grained, giving it a pure look.
Vivo X90 Professional+ – Low gentle noise
Vivo X90 Professional+ – Low noise
Vivo X80 Professional – Low gentle noise
Vivo X80 Professional – Barely larger degree of noise
Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Snapdragon) – Low gentle noise
Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Snapdragon) – Robust and coarse noise
Artifacts
80
Google Pixel 6
Google Pixel 6
The artifacts analysis appears at lens shading, chromatic aberrations, geometrical distortion, edges ringing, halos, ghosting, quantization, sudden coloration hue shifts, amongst others sort of doable unnatural results on pictures. The extra extreme and the extra frequent the artifact, the upper the purpose deduction on the rating. The principle artifacts noticed and corresponding level loss are listed beneath.
Most important photograph artifacts penalties
General, picture artifacts have been pretty nicely underneath management, however our testers seen some coloration quantization in plenty of take a look at scenes, particularly underneath indoor lighting and in low gentle.
Vivo X90 Professional+ – Artifacts
Vivo X90 Professional+ – Robust coloration quantization on the wall
Vivo X80 Professional – Much less intrusive coloration quantization on the wall
We additionally seen fusion artifacts, particularly on high-contrast scenes with HDR processing kicking in.
Vivo X90 Professional+ – Artifacts
Vivo X90 Professional+ – Fusion artifact
Bokeh
70
Huawei Mate 50 Professional
Huawei Mate 50 Professional
Bokeh is examined in a single devoted mode, often portrait or aperture mode, and analyzed by visually inspecting all the photographs captured within the lab and in pure circumstances. The purpose is to breed portrait pictures comparable to at least one taken with a DLSR and a large aperture. The principle picture high quality attributes paid consideration to are depth estimation, artifacts, blur gradient, and the form of the bokeh blur spotlights. Portrait picture high quality attributes (publicity, coloration, texture) are additionally taken under consideration.
In bokeh mode, the Vivo X90 Professional+ produced usually good photos, with pretty good separation of topic and background. Nevertheless, the Vivo’s bokeh mode struggled with some take a look at circumstances, for instance when the background was nearer to the topic.
Vivo X90 Professional+ – Depth estimation failures on the background and failure on the hair
Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Snapdragon) – Barely extra correct depth estimation on the background however failure on the hair
Preview
71
Apple iPhone 14 Professional Max
Apple iPhone 14 Professional Max
Preview checks analyze the picture high quality of the digital camera app’s preview of the picture, with explicit consideration paid to the distinction between the seize and the preview, particularly relating to dynamic vary and the appliance of the bokeh impact. Additionally evaluated is the smoothness of the publicity, coloration and focus adaptation when zooming from the minimal to the maximal zoom issue obtainable. The preview body price is measured utilizing the LED Common Timer.
The picture preview on the show of the Vivo X90 Professional+ confirmed enhancements over its predecessor the X80 Professional, however there have been nonetheless noticeable variations between preview and seize, particularly in dynamic vary, which is way decrease in preview than within the last picture.
Vivo X90 Professional+ Seize – Excessive dynamic vary
Vivo X90 Professional+ Preview – Restricted dynamic vary
Vivo X90 Professional+ Seize – Excessive dynamic vary
Vivo X90 Professional+ Preview – Restricted dynamic vary
Zoom
150
Honor Magic4 Final
Honor Magic4 Final
About DXOMARK Digital camera Zoom checks
DXOMARK engineers seize and consider over 400 take a look at photos in managed lab environments and in out of doors, indoor, and low-light pure scenes, utilizing the digital camera’s default settings and pinch zoom at varied zoom components from extremely large to very long-range zoom. The analysis is carried out by visually inspecting the photographs towards a reference of pure scenes, and by operating goal measurements of chart mages captured within the lab underneath completely different circumstances from 20 to 1000 lux and coloration temperatures from 2300K to 6500K.
In testing, the Vivo X90 Professional+ supplied very excessive picture high quality throughout virtually the whole zoom vary. Goal publicity was usually correct, with a large dynamic vary. Nevertheless, some slight inconsistencies between completely different scenes in addition to some artifacts have been seen. General, the Vivo did very nicely on this class, attaining the second-best outcome thus far, simply behind the Honor Magic4 Final.
Vivo X90 Professional Plus Zoom Scores vs Extremely-Premium
This graph illustrates the relative scores for the completely different zoom ranges evaluated. The abscissa is expressed in 35mm equal focal size. Zooming-in scores are displayed on the proper and Zooming-out scores on the left.
Video Zoom
The Vivo’s video zoom function supplied a reasonably good degree of element throughout the zoom vary. As well as, focus, publicity, and coloration transition have been comparatively clean when shifting between digital camera modules.
Extensive
104
Huawei Mate 50 Professional
Huawei Mate 50 Professional
These checks analyze the efficiency of the ultra-wide digital camera at a number of focal lengths from 12 mm to twenty mm. All picture high quality attributes are evaluated, with explicit consideration paid to such artifacts as chromatic aberrations, lens softness, and distortion. Footage beneath are an extract of examined scenes.
The Vivo X90 Professional+ comes with a 14mm equal ultra-wide digital camera, which affords a large discipline of view in addition to good picture outcomes with usually nice rendering. The digital camera managed to offer an honest texture/noise tradeoff compared with the competitors. However some lack of element and lack of saturation have been noticeable.
Vivo X90 Professional+ – Extremely-wide
Vivo X90 Professional+ – Crop – Some lack of element
Vivo X80 Professional (Snapdragon) – Extremely-wide
Vivo X80 Professional (Snapdragon) – Crop – Some lack of element
Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Snapdragon) – Extremely-wide
Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Snapdragon) – Crop – Good element
Tele
115
Honor Magic4 Final
Honor Magic4 Final
All picture high quality attributes are evaluated at focal lengths from roughly 40 mm to 300 mm, with explicit consideration paid to texture and element. The rating is derived from plenty of goal measurements within the lab and perceptual evaluation of real-life photos.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) element preservation rating per focal size
This graph exhibits the evolution of the DMC element preservation rating with respect to the full-frame equal focal size for various gentle circumstances. The x-axis represents the equal focal size measured for every corresponding taking pictures distance and the y-axis represents the utmost particulars preservation metric rating: larger worth means higher high quality. Giant dots correspond to zoom ratio obtainable within the consumer interface of the digital camera utility.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) element preservation rating per focal size
This graph exhibits the evolution of the DMC element preservation rating with respect to the full-frame equal focal size for various gentle circumstances. The x-axis represents the equal focal size measured for every corresponding taking pictures distance and the y-axis represents the utmost particulars preservation metric rating: larger worth means higher high quality. Giant dots correspond to zoom ratio obtainable within the consumer interface of the digital camera utility.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) element preservation rating per focal size
This graph exhibits the evolution of the DMC element preservation rating with respect to the full-frame equal focal size for various gentle circumstances. The x-axis represents the equal focal size measured for every corresponding taking pictures distance and the y-axis represents the utmost particulars preservation metric rating: larger worth means higher high quality. Giant dots correspond to zoom ratio obtainable within the consumer interface of the digital camera utility.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) element preservation rating per focal size
This graph exhibits the evolution of the DMC element preservation rating with respect to the full-frame equal focal size for various gentle circumstances. The x-axis represents the equal focal size measured for every corresponding taking pictures distance and the y-axis represents the utmost particulars preservation metric rating: larger worth means higher high quality. Giant dots correspond to zoom ratio obtainable within the consumer interface of the digital camera utility.
At medium-range tele, the extent of element was usually larger than on the opponents, with low noise, even in low gentle.
Vivo X90 Professional+ – Medium-range tele
Vivo X90 Professional+ – Good element
Vivo X80 Professional (Snapdragon) – Medium-range tele
Vivo X80 Professional (Snapdragon) – Good element, slight noise
Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Snapdragon) – Medium-range tele
Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Snapdragon) – Lack of element, noise
At long-range tele settings, the extent of element was excessive. Photos confirmed correct publicity, however our testers did typically observe slight coloration casts.
Vivo X90 Professional+ – Lengthy vary tele
Vivo X90 Professional+ – Good element
Vivo X80 Professional (Snapdragon) – Lengthy vary tele
Vivo X80 Professional (Snapdragon) – Good element, slight noise
Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Snapdragon) – Lengthy vary tele
Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Snapdragon) – Lack of element, noise
Video
129
Apple iPhone 14 Professional Max
Apple iPhone 14 Professional Max
About DXOMARK Digital camera Video checks
DXOMARK engineers seize and consider greater than 2.5 hours of video in managed lab environments and in pure low-light, indoor and out of doors scenes, utilizing the digital camera’s default settings. The analysis consists of visually inspecting pure movies taken in varied circumstances and operating goal measurements on movies of charts recorded within the lab underneath completely different circumstances from 1 to 1000+ lux and coloration temperatures from 2,300K to six,500K.
The Vivo X90 Professional+ video mode was examined at 4K decision and 30 frames per second. It supplied a reasonably first rate efficiency by way of publicity, noise, and coloration rendering, slightly tender texture rendering, however the occasional focus failures and artifacts meant it lagged behind a few of its Extremely-Premium opponents in different areas.
Vivo X90 Professional Plus Video scores vs Extremely-Premium
Video checks analyze the identical picture high quality attributes as for nonetheless photos, reminiscent of publicity, coloration, texture, or noise, along with temporal features reminiscent of pace, and smoothness and stability of publicity, white stability, and autofocus transitions.
Publicity
105
Apple iPhone 14 Professional Max
Apple iPhone 14 Professional Max
Publicity checks consider the brightness of the principle topic and the dynamic vary, eg. the power to render seen particulars in each shiny and darkish areas of the picture. Stability and temporal adaption of the publicity are additionally analyzed.
The Vivo X90 Professional+ carried out nicely in video publicity, due to an correct goal publicity, clean and correct diversifications, and a fairly large dynamic vary.
Vivo X90 Professional+ – Extensive dynamic vary
Vivo X80 Professional (Snapdragon) – Spotlight clipping
Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Snapdragon) – Slight spotlight clipping
Â
Colour
106
Apple iPhone 14 Professional Max
Apple iPhone 14 Professional Max
Picture-quality coloration evaluation appears at coloration rendering, skin-tone rendering, white stability, coloration shading, stability of the white stability and its adaption when gentle is altering.
Colours have been usually good, particularly in shiny gentle and underneath indoor lighting.
Vivo X90 Professional+ – Pretty correct colours
Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Snapdragon) – Pretty correct colours however underexposure
Autofocus
93
Apple iPhone 14 Professional Max
Apple iPhone 14 Professional Max
Throughout our video testing, the autofocus was the Vivo’s most necessary level of concern. It carried out precisely more often than not, however our testers additionally noticed some failures, as seen within the pattern clip beneath.
Vivo X90 Professional+ – Focus failure
Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Snapdragon) – Correct focus
Texture
96
Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely
Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely
Texture checks analyze the extent of particulars and texture of the real-life movies in addition to the movies of charts recorded within the lab. Pure movies recordings are visually evaluated, with explicit consideration paid to the extent of particulars within the shiny and areas in addition to at midnight. Goal measurements are carried out of photos of charts taken in varied circumstances from 1 to 1000 lux. The charts used are the DXOMARK chart (DMC) and Lifeless Leaves chart.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) element preservation video rating vs lux ranges
This graph exhibits the evolution of the DMC element preservation video rating with the extent of lux in video. DMC element preservation rating is derived from an AI-based metric educated to guage texture and particulars rendering on a number of crops of our DXOMARK chart.
The Vivo X90 Professional+ lagged behind its direct opponents by way of video element preservation and texture acutance. Element rendering was fairly tender in most circumstances.
Noise
106
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Noise checks analyze varied attributes of noise reminiscent of depth, chromaticity, grain, construction, temporal features on real-life video recording in addition to movies of charts taken within the lab. Pure movies are visually evaluated, with explicit consideration paid to the noise at midnight areas and excessive dynamic vary circumstances. Goal measurements are carried out on the movies of charts recorded in varied circumstances from 1 to 1000 lux. The chart used is the DXOMARK visible noise chart.
Spatial visible noise evolution with the illuminance degree
This graph exhibits the evolution of spatial visible noise with the extent of lux. Spatial visible noise is measured on the visible noise chart within the video noise setup. DXOMARK visible noise measurement is derived from ISO15739 customary.
Temporal visible noise evolution with the illuminance degree
This graph exhibits the evolution of temporal visible noise with the extent of lux. Temporal visible noise is measured on the visible noise chart within the video noise setup.
Vivo X90 Professional+ – Noise is seen in lowlight circumstances, particularly right here on the deep mannequin’s face.
On the upside, video noise was nicely managed on the Vivo X90 Professional+ when in comparison with its rivals in our take a look at. Nevertheless, it’s nonetheless not among the many greatest in its value section.
Stabilization
113
Apple iPhone 14 Professional Max
Apple iPhone 14 Professional Max
Stabilization analysis checks the power of the machine to stabilize footage due to software program or {hardware} applied sciences reminiscent of OIS, EIS, or any others means. The analysis appears at residual movement, smoothness, jello artifacts and residual movement blur on stroll and run use circumstances in varied lighting circumstances. The video beneath is an extract from one of many examined scenes.
Video stabilization was fairly efficient, with strolling movement and static hand-holding being counteracted nicely. Nevertheless, we noticed some sharpness variations between frames.
Vivo X90 Professional+ – Good video stabilization
Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Snapdragon) – Fairly good video stabilization
Artifacts
75
Xiaomi 12S Extremely
Xiaomi 12S Extremely
Artifacts are evaluated with MTF and ringing measurements on the SFR chart within the lab in addition to frame-rate measurements utilizing the LED Common Timer. Pure movies are visually evaluated by paying explicit consideration to artifacts reminiscent of aliasing, quantization, blocking, and hue shift, amongst others. The extra extreme and the extra frequent the artifact, the upper the purpose deduction from the rating. The principle artifacts and corresponding level loss are listed beneath.
Most important video artifacts penalties
General, the Vivo X90 Professional+ managed the most typical video artifacts fairly nicely, however some artifacts, together with ghosting and ringing, have been nonetheless noticeable. Factors have been additionally deducted for the 30-frame-per-second price. In comparison with different gadgets that provide 60fps, the Vivo’s movies have been much less clean. This was significantly noticeable when panning.
Â
